Glasgow Coma Scale: A Comprehensive Review of Its Applications, Limitations, and Advancements

Authors

  • Aquila Graham Medical Faculty, Lampung University
  • Anggi Setiorini Universitas Lampung
  • Linda Septiani Universitas Lampung
  • Roro Rukmi Windi Perdani Universitas Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53089/medula.v14i11.1396

Abstract

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is a widely used neurological assessment tool for evaluating the level of consciousness in patients with brain injury. Introduced in 1974 by Teasdale and Jennett, it has become a standard in emergency departments, intensive care units, and neurosurgical wards worldwide. The GCS assesses patient responses in three domains: eye opening, verbal response, and motor response, with scores ranging from 3 (deep coma) to 15 (fully conscious). The GCS score is used to classify the severity of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and predict clinical outcomes. However, several studies have highlighted limitations of the GCS, particularly in predicting patient outcomes and its application in specific populations. This article provides a critical review of the GCS, including its utility, limitations, and ongoing modifications and developments.

References

Almojuela A, Hasen M, Zeiler FA. The Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) Score and Its Use in Outcome Prediction: A Scoping Systematic Review of the Adult Literature. Neurocrit Care. 2019 Aug;31(1):162-175. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0630-9. PMID: 30411302.

Amirtharaj, A. D., Lazarus, E. R., & Alzaabi, O. (2022). Assessing validity and reliability of glasgow coma scale and full outline of unresponsiveness score: A systematic review. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S2), 12293–12306.

Bodien YG, Barra A, Temkin NR, Barber J, Foreman B, Vassar M, Robertson C, Taylor SR, Markowitz AJ, Manley GT, Giacino JT, Edlow BL; TRACK-TBI Investigators. Diagnosing Level of Consciousness: The Limits of the Glasgow Coma Scale Total Score. J Neurotrauma. 2021 Dec;38(23):3295-3305. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0199. PMID: 34605668; PMCID: PMC8917895.

Douglas DB, Ro T, Toffoli T, Krawchuk B, Muldermans J, Gullo J, Dulberger A, Anderson AE, Douglas PK, Wintermark M. Neuroimaging of Traumatic Brain Injury. Med Sci (Basel). 2018 Dec 20;7(1):2. doi: 10.3390/medsci7010002. PMID: 30577545; PMCID: PMC6358760.

Jain S, Iverson LM. Glasgow Coma Scale. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. [diakses 2024 Des 12]. Tersedia dari: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513298/

Kehoe A, et al. Glasgow Coma Scale is unreliable for the prediction of severe head injury in elderly trauma patients. Emerg Med J. 2014;32(8):613-617.

Majdan M, et al. Limitations of the Glasgow Coma Scale in the assessment of mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj. 2019;33(6):736-743.

Margono LS, Ardiansyah D. Pendarahan Intra Serebral. In: Machfoed MH, Hamdan M, Matchin A, editors. Buku Ajar Ilmu Penyakit Saraf. Surabaya: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Airlangga; 2011.

Mawuntu A. Meninjau Kembali Glasgow Coma Scale: Masihkah Relevan?. Majalah Kedokteran Neurosains Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Saraf Indonesia. 2019;36:177-83.

Reith FC, Van den Brande R, Synnot A, Gruen R, Maas AI. The reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jan;42(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4124-3. Epub 2015 Nov 12. PMID: 26564211.

Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow. Glasgow Coma Scale assessment aid [Internet]. Glasgow: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow; [diakses 2024 Des 12]. Tersedia dari: https://www.glasgowcomascale.org/downloads/GCS-Assessment-Aid-English.pdf?v=3

Zhu J, Shan Y, Li Y, Wu X, Gao G. Predicting the Severity and Discharge Prognosis of Traumatic Brain Injury Based on Intracranial Pressure Data Using Machine Learning Algorithms. World Neurosurg. 2024;185:102018.

Published

2025-02-20

How to Cite

Aquila Graham, Setiorini, A. ., Septiani, L. ., & Perdani, R. R. W. (2025). Glasgow Coma Scale: A Comprehensive Review of Its Applications, Limitations, and Advancements. Medical Profession Journal of Lampung, 14(11), 2172-2176. https://doi.org/10.53089/medula.v14i11.1396

Issue

Section

Artikel

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>