The Differences of Clinical Reasoning Scores for Pre-Clinical Stage and Clinical Stage in Medical Faculty Lampung University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53089/medula.v11i1.152Keywords:
Clinical reasoning, preklinik, klinikAbstract
Clinical reasoning is a complex set ideas of diagnosis decision making process that involves those experiences, skill, and reflective thought. Medical faculty students undergoing pre-clinical and clinical students should improve their clinical reasoning as early as possible, so it can produce good quality of medical students. This study aims to determine the difference of clinical reasoning score between pre-clinical and clinical medical students of Lampung University. This was a descriptive analytic study using cross sectional study. Sampling using non-probability sampling method with the type of consecutive sampling and measuring instruments in the form of script concordance test. Data analysis was done by independent T test. The research conducted on 124 respondents with independent test result shows the score of preclinical student with mean 4,927 ± 1.3727 and score of clinical students with mean 5,416 ± 1,6020 with p = 0,041. There are a significant difference clinical reasoning score between pre-clinical and clinical medical students of Lampung University. This study has a significant difference of clinical reasoning score between pre-clinical and clinical medical students of Lampung University. Clinical reasoning in students can be improved by increasing cognition and metacognition through learning self-regulation.
References
Daftar Pustaka
McLean SF. Case-Based Learning and its application in medical and health-care fields: a review of worldwide literature. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development. 2016, 3:39–49.
Kassirer JP. Teaching clinical reasoning: case-based and coached. Academic Medicine. 2010, 85(07): 1118 – 1124.
Kiesewetter J, Ebersbach R, Tsalas N, Holzer M, Schimidmaler R, Fischer MR. Knowledge is not enough to solve the problems – the role of diagnostic knowledge in clinical reasoning activiies. BMC Medical Education. 2016, 16: 311-303.
Pujiati PA. The difference in clinical reasoning competence between pre-clinical students and clinical students on pediatric tropical disease cases. Sains Medika. 2015, 6(1):25–29.
Dahlan, M. Besar Sampel dan Cara Pengambilan Sampel dalam Penelitian Kedokteran dan Kesehatan. Edisi ke-3. Jakarta: Salemba Medika, 2010.
Lubarsky S, Charlin B, Cook DA, Chalk, C, van der Vleuten CPM. Script concordance testing: a review of published validity evidence. Medical Education. 2011, 45(4): 329–38.
Findyartini A, Hawthorne L, Mccoll G, & Chiavaroli N. How clinical reasoning is taught and learned : Cultural perspectives from the University of Melbourne and Universitas Indonesia. BMC Medical Education. 2016, 16: 195-185
Septiani. Perbedaan Kemampuan Clinical Reasoning Mahasiswa Preklinik Dengan Mahasiswa Rotasi Klinik FF Unissula. [Skripsi]. Semarang: Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, 2014.
Muir F. The Understanding and Experience of Students, Tutors and Educators Regarding Reflection in Medical Education: a Qualitative Study. International Journal of Medical Education. 2010, 1: 61-67.
Eva, K. W. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Medical education, 2005 39(1), 98-106.
Barrow M, McKimm J, Samarasekera DD. Strategies for Planning and Designing Medical Curricula and Clinical Teaching. South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education. 2010, 4(1): 2-7.
Gesundheit, N., Brutlag, P., Youngblood, P., Gunning, W. T., Zary, N., & Fors, U. The use of virtual patients to assess the clinical skills and reasoning of medical students: initial insights on student acceptance. Medical teacher. 2009, 31(8), 739-742.
Tiara. Hubungan Refleksi Diri Terhadap Nilai Ujian Akhir Blok (Uab) Tropical Infectious Disease (TID) Mahasiswa Tahun Kedua Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Lampung Tahun 2017 [skripsi]. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung, 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 MEDULA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.