Simple Breast Cyst Ultrasonography as a Predictor of Breast Cancer

Authors

  • Fuad Iqbal Elka Putra Cileungsi Regional Hospital, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Hesti Ariyanti Kartika Husada Military Hospital Tk.II, Tanjungpura, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53089/medula.v16i1.1487

Keywords:

kanker payudara, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS, kista payudara

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide, with an incidence rate increasing by 0.5% annually, breast cysts often occur in women of reproductive age to perimenopause. Most breast cysts are benign, especially in women of reproductive age, where hormonal fluctuations of estrogen and progesterone play a role in their formation. However, complex breast cysts have the potential for malignancy. Ultrasonography is an inexpensive and easy modality that can be used as a screening and diagnosis of breast lesions compared to MRI and CT-Scan. A 43-year-old woman was found to have pain in the Left Outer Quadrant with an identified anechoic lesion, with firm and regular borders, measuring 3.9 mm x 3.6 mm, no nipple retraction. In the Upper Outer Quadrant, a well-defined anechoic lesion measuring 11.6 mm x 6.3 mm was found, without nipple retraction. Axillary, interpectoral, supraclavicular, and cervical lymph nodes were not prominent. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) is a standardized system developed by the American College of Radiology to improve the consistency and clarity of breast imaging reports. Simple cysts are typically categorized as benign, falling within a BI-RADS 2. Cysts are considered suspicious or highly suspicious (BI-RADS 4 or 5) if they exhibit hemorrhagic contents, wall thickening, irregular septa, associated solid lesions, irregular vascularity, or other radiologic findings that may indicate malignancy. Ultrasonography is an effective and accessible modality that can be an important tool for obstetricians and gynecologists in the early detection and evaluation of potentially malignant cystic breast changes.

Author Biographies

Fuad Iqbal Elka Putra, Cileungsi Regional Hospital, Bogor, Indonesia

 

     

Hesti Ariyanti, Kartika Husada Military Hospital Tk.II, Tanjungpura, Indonesia

 

 

References

Koh J, Kim MJ. Erratum to: Introduction of a New Staging System of Breast Cancer for Radiologists: An Emphasis on the Prognostic Stage (Korean J Radiol 2019;20(1):69-82, 10.3348/kjr.2018.0231). Korean J Radiol. 2022;23(5):570. doi:10.3348/kjr.2022.0246

Chang YW, Kim HW, Kwon KH, Choi DL, Yang SB, Lee DW. Review of Breast Cancers That Can Mimic a Cystic Component: Ultrasonographic and Pathologic Correlations. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2011;64(3):273. doi:10.3348/jksr.2011.64.3.273

Li Y, Peng Y, He X. A highly aggressive invasive ductal carcinoma from a complex cystic breast mass and BI-RADS assessment: A case report. Med (United States). 2018;97(50):6-9. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000013740

Liu C, Chen M, Shi Y. Downregulation of hsa_circ_0006220 and its correlation with clinicopathological factors in human breast cancer. Gland Surg. 2021;10(1):816-825. doi:10.21037/gs-21-42

Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Miller KD, et al. Breast Cancer Statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(6):524-541. doi:10.3322/caac.21754

Fan L, Strasser-Weippl K, Li JJ, et al. Breast cancer in China. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(7). doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70567-9

Suzuki A, Ishida T, Ohuchi N. Controversies in breast cancer screening for women aged 40-49 years. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44(7):613-618. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyu054

Choi JS, Han BK, Ko EY, Kim GR, Ko ES, Park KW. Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(1):319-329. doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5585-x

Chiu AW. Retraction notice. Eur Urol. 1993;23(3):378.

Strigel RM, Burnside ES, Elezaby M, et al. Utility of BI-RADS assessment category 4 subdivisions for screening breast MRI. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(6):1392-1399. doi:10.2214/AJR.16.16730

Atashgaran V, Wrin J, Barry SC, Dasari P, Ingman WV. Dissecting the Biology of Menstrual Cycle-Associated Breast Cancer Risk. Front Oncol. 2016 Dec 26;6:267. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00267. PMID: 28083513; PMCID: PMC5183603.

Budai B, Számel I, Sulyok Z, Németh M, Bak M, Kralovánszky J, Ottó S, Besznyák I, Purohit A, Parish DC, Reed MJ. Influence of hormonal status of patients with cystic disease on the composition of cyst fluid and breast cancer risk. Anticancer Res. 2000 Sep-Oct;20(5C):3879-86. PMID: 11268470.

Mehta N, Rousslang L, Shokouh-Amiri M, Wiley EL, Green L. Complex solid and cystic breast cancer: A series of six case reports. J Radiol Case Rep. 2020;14(2):21-44. doi:10.3941/jrcr.v14i2.3712

Tagliafico AS, Piana M, Schenone D, Lai R, Massone AM, Houssami N. Overview of radiomics in breast cancer diagnosis and prognostication. Breast. 2020;49:74-80. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2019.10.018

European Society of Radiology (ESR). Medical imaging in personalised medicine: a white paper of the research committee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging. 2015;6(2):141-155. doi:10.1007/s13244-015-0394-0

Said NH, Selim A. Benign and Malignant Ultrasound Semiology. In: Springer, Cham; 2018:71-83. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61681-0_6

Merjane V, Perin DMP, El Bacha PMG, Miranda BMM, Bitencourt AGV, Iared W. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®): a success history and particularities of its use in Brazil. Rev Bras Ginecol e Obstet. 2024;46:1-8. doi:10.61622/rbgo/2024AR06

Khan P, Masroor I, Alam MS, Salam A, Ali Y, Khan MS. Sonographic Characteristics and Pathology Correlation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 Lesions. Cureus. 2023;15(12):4-11.doi:10.7759/cureus.51410

Vorherr H. Fibrocystic breast disease: pathophysiology, pathomorphology, clinical picture, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Jan;154(1):161-79. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90421-7. PMID: 3511705.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 179: Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening in Average-Risk Women. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(1):e1–e16.

Kowalski A, Okoye E. Breast Cyst. [Updated 2023 Sep 4]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562196/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Published

2026-05-11

How to Cite

Putra, F. I. E., & Ariyanti, H. (2026). Simple Breast Cyst Ultrasonography as a Predictor of Breast Cancer. Medical Profession Journal of Lampung, 16(1), 208-212. https://doi.org/10.53089/medula.v16i1.1487

Issue

Section

Artikel